This section covers the initial planning phase of a systematic review, including developing a research question, selecting the type of review, and creating a protocol.
Informação
This section covers the initial planning phase of a systematic review, including developing a research question, selecting the type of review, and creating a protocol.
The first step in each type of systematic review should be planning. Well-executed, detailed planning is one of the most critical elements of the systematic review process. Time spent on planning will save time in other stages of the systematic review process. The planning process includes stages such as identifying the research question, selecting the type of review, establishing a protocol, and creating a conceptual framework.
The first step in each type of systematic review should be planning. Well-executed, detailed planning is one of the most critical elements of the systematic review process. Time spent on planning will save time in other stages of the systematic review process. The planning process includes stages such as identifying the research question, selecting the type of review, establishing a protocol, and creating a conceptual framework.
The first step in each type of systematic review should be planning. Well-executed, detailed planning is one of the most critical elements of the systematic review process. Time spent on planning will save time in other stages of the systematic review process. The planning process includes stages such as identifying the research question, selecting the type of review, establishing a protocol, and creating a conceptual framework.
The first step in each type of systematic review should be planning. Well-executed, detailed planning is one of the most critical elements of the systematic review process. Time spent on planning will save time in other stages of the systematic review process. The planning process includes stages such as identifying the research question, selecting the type of review, establishing a protocol, and creating a conceptual framework.
The first step in each type of systematic review should be planning. Well-executed, detailed planning is one of the most critical elements of the systematic review process. Time spent on planning will save time in other stages of the systematic review process. The planning process includes stages such as identifying the research question, selecting the type of review, establishing a protocol, and creating a conceptual framework.
Asgari, Z., Naghavi, A., & Abedi, M. R. (2023). Grief interventions: A qualitative review of systematic reviews. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 28(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2022.2102304
Gough, D., & Richardson, M. (2018). Systematic reviews. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 63–75). Routledge.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.
Kushairi, N., & Ahmi, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: a Bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4401–4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10457-8/TABLES/16
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS, and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. In BMC Health Services Research (Vol. 14, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
Özdemir, N., Gümüş, S., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2022). A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221118662
Taubner, H., Tideman, M., & Staland Nyman, C. (2022). Employment sustainability for people with ıntellectual disability: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10926-021-10020-9/TABLES/4