Modul 1. PISANJE ČLANAKA ZA NAUČNE ČASOPISE: SVEOBUHVATNI VODIČ

Glavni fokus Modula 1 je objašnjenje procesa pripreme naučnih radova i njihovih glavnih delova. U skladu s tim, modul ima za cilj da pomogne istraživačima pre, tokom i nakon pisanja naučnih radova. Posmatrano po poglavljima, prvo poglavlje se odnosi na uvodni deo naučnog rada. U ovom odeljku se objašnjava šta istraživači treba da urade pre nego što počnu da pišu naučne članke i kako da napišu važnost naučnih članaka u uvodu. Zatim se objašnjavaju elementi uvoda kao što su tema istraživanja, argument, organizacija teksta, apstrakt i ključne reči. Drugo poglavlje se fokusira na to kako napisati teorijski okvir. U ovom poglavlju se najpre diskutuje kako sprovesti pregled literature, kako analizirati i sintetizovati relevantne studije. Zatim se objašnjavaju drugi elementi teorijskog okvira kao što su značaj, doprinosi, istraživačka pitanja i hipoteze. Na kraju se daju saveti o pripremi i predstavljanju okvira i vizuelnih prikaza. Treće poglavlje se bavi metodologijom u naučnom pisanju. Ovo poglavlje najpre objašnjava kako izveštavati o odabranim istraživačkim metodama i dizajnu. Zatim se objašnjava proces implementacije metodologije određivanjem populacije, uzorka i studijske grupe, definisanjem alata za prikupljanje podataka i objašnjavanjem procesa prikupljanja podataka. Na kraju se objašnjavaju metodološke karakteristike pojmova validnosti, pouzdanosti i verodostojnosti. Četvrto poglavlje se bavi analizom podataka. To podrazumeva objašnjenja kako analizirati kvantitativne i kvalitativne podatke i izveštavati o njima u akademskom pisanju. Peto poglavlje se odnosi na pisanje odeljaka sa nalazima/rezultatima u procesu naučnog pisanja. U ovom poglavlju se objašnjava kako interpretirati nalaze i koristiti tabele i slike za potkrepljivanje interpretacija rezultata studije. Šesto poglavlje daje savete o diskusiji sa povezanim studijama u literaturi, pripremanju zaključaka u smislu rezultata studije i navođenju ograničenja studije. Dodatne teme kao što su etička izjava, sukob interesa, autorska prava, itd. objašnjene su u sedmom poglavlju. Poslednje, osmo poglavlje, objašnjava kako napisati reference prema formatima referenciranja: Čikago, MLA i APA.

Аутори

Dr. Mustafa ÖZGENEL

Dr. Osman ÖZDEMİR

Dr. Şakir ÇINKIR

MAPA MODULA

Ciljevi

Poglavlje 1. UVOD

Cilj 1 – Objasniti važnost naučnih publikacija.

Cilj 2 – Prilagoditi naučne tekstove u odnosu na publiku.

Cilj 3 – Kreirati realističan vremenski okvir u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 4 – Znanje o odgovarajućoj saradnji i kooperaciji.

Cilj 5 – Razumeti važnost etike i integriteta.

Cilj 6 – Identifikovati originalnu temu istraživanja.

Cilj 7 – Napisati argument studije u odgovarajućem delu teksta.

Cilj 8 – Znati organizaciju akademskog pisanja.

Cilj 9 – Napisati odgovarajući apstrakt za studiju.

Cilj 10 – Objasniti izjavu o problemu u uvodu.

Cilj 11 – Objasniti važnost studije u uvodu.

Poglavlje 2. TEORIJSKA POZADINA

Cilj 1 – Definisati proces pregleda literature.

Cilj 2 – Znati pojam analize literature.

Cilj 3 – Objasniti pisanje sinteze sa literaturom.

Cilj 4 – Izraziti značaj / doprinose studije.

Cilj 5 – Definisati pojmove istraživačkih pitanja i hipoteza.

Cilj 6 – Objasniti važnost okvira.

Cilj 7 – Dati smernice o tome kako napraviti vizuelne prikaze.

Poglavlje 3. METODOLOGIJA

Cilj 1 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati metodološki deo.

Cilj 2 – Objasniti kvalitativnu istraživačku metodu i dizajn.

Cilj 3 – Objasniti kvantitativnu istraživačku metodu i dizajn.

Cilj 4 – Objasniti mešovitu istraživačku metodu i dizajn.

Cilj 5 – Objasniti kako napisati mešovitu istraživačku metodu i dizajn.

Cilj 6 – Objasniti kako napisati deo o populaciji/uzorku/studijskoj grupi u odnosu na istraživačku metodu.

Cilj 7 – Objasniti osnove alata i procesa prikupljanja podataka.

Cilj 8 – Dati smernice o tome kako izveštavati o validnosti, pouzdanosti i verodostojnosti studije.

Poglavlje 4. ANALIZA PODATAKA

Cilj 1 – Definisati proces analize kvantitativnih podataka u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 2 – Definisati proces analize kvalitativnih podataka u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 3 – Dati smernice o tome kako izveštavati deo o analizi podataka u naučnom pisanju.

Poglavlje 5. NALAZI / REZULTATI

Cilj 1 – Dati smernice o tome kako izveštavati deo o nalazima/rezultatima u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 2 – Znati kako interpretirati podatke kako bi se došlo do specifičnih rezultata.

Cilj 3 – Znati kako koristiti tabele i slike za potkrepljivanje interpretacija nalaza.

Poglavlje 6. DISKUSIJA, ZAKLJUČAK I PREPORUKE

Cilj 1 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati deo za diskusiju.

Cilj 2 – Objasniti kako diskutovati rezultate u odnosu na povezane studije u literaturi.

Cilj 3 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati zaključni deo.

Cilj 4 – Objasniti kako interpretirati rezultate kao zaključak.

Cilj 5 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati preporuke.

Cilj 6 – Objasniti kako davati preporuke drugim istraživačima i praktičarima.

Cilj 7 – Dati smernice o tome kako izveštavati o ograničenjima studije.

Poglavlje 7. DODATNE TEME

Cilj 1 – Objasniti kako formirati etičku izjavu.

Cilj 2 – Objasniti kako formirati izjavu o sukobu interesa.

Cilj 3 – Objasniti kako formirati izjavu o finansiranju i sponzorstvu u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 4 – Poznavati osnova pitanja autorskih prava.

Cilj 5 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati zahvalnice.

Poglavlje 8. PISANJE REFERENCI

Cilj 1 – Dati smernice o tome kako navesti reference u naučnom pisanju.

Cilj 2 – Dati smernice o tome kako pisati deo sa referencama u različitim stilovima naučnog pisanja.

Cilj 3 – Znati kako doći do različitih priručnika za stilove naučnog pisanja.

Abeza, G., O'Reilly, N., Dottori, M., Séguin, B., & Nzindukiyimana, O. (2015). Mixed methods research in sport marketing. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 9(1), 40-56.

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

Andrade, C. (2011). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(2), 172.

Beau, S., Taouil, F. T., & Hassanaly, P. (2010, February). Collaborate to co-elaborate knowledge between necessity and opportunity. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Information Systems and Economic Intelligence (SIIE), Sousse, Tunis (pp. 18-20).

Becker, H. S. (2013). Sosyal bilimcinin yazma çilesi. Yazımın sosyal organizasyonu kuramı (Ş. Geniş, Trans.). Heretik.

Belcher, W. L. (2019). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic success publishing. The University of Chicago Press.

Blair, E., Maharaj, C., & Primus, S. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1465-1482.

Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. Allyn & Bacon.

Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.

Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215-2222.

Bourne, P. E. (2005). Ten simple rules for getting published. PLoS Computational Biology, 1(5), e57.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Cals, J. W. L., & Kotz, D. (2013). Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part I: How to get started. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(4), 397-401.

Cinkir, S. (2023). Academic reading and writing course. Seminar notes. Ankara University, Faculty of Educational Sciences.

Cinkir, S. (2018). Writing research reports. In A. Ersoy (Ed.), Research methods (pp. 210-242). Anadolu University Publishing.

Clark, A., & Smith, R. (2017). The role of academic communication in the field of science. Journal of Academic Studies, 13(4), 22-36.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Conn, V. S. (2017). How to craft a strong discussion section. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(5), 607–608.

Cooper, I. D. (2015). How to write an original research paper (and get it published). Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(2), 67.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

Cryer, P. (2006). The research student's guide to success. McGraw-Hill Education.

Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7-29.

Driscoll, D. L. (2011, December 21). Connected, disconnected, or uncertain: student attitudes about future writing contexts and perceptions of transfer from first year writing to the disciplines. Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning, and Academic Writing, 8(2), 1-31.

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11, 17-33.

Fahy, K. (2008). Writing for publication: Argument and evidence. Women and Birth, 21(3), 113-117.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

Fink, A. (2014). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage.

Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage.

Garg, N., & Turtle, H. (1997). Indexing technical literature: An automatic text classification problem. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(3), 214-229.

George, L., Smith, P., & Henry, M. (2016). Understanding academic publishing: A case study. Journal of Higher Education, 23(1), 56-71.

Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. Jossey-Bass.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.

Hartley, J. (2007). Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles. Library & Information Science Research, 29(4), 553-568.

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge.

Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Springer.

Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 65-70.

Hyland, K. (2018). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 58-69.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2006). Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where. PLoS Clinical Trials, 1(7), e36.

Jacobs, A. M. (2009). On the validity of bibliometric research quality indicators: The question of theoretical and methodological validity. Higher Education, 58(6), 789-801.

Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653-661.

Jirge, P. R. (2017). Preparing and publishing a scientific manuscript. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 10(1), 3.

Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.

Langfeldt, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests, and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 31-41.

Leahy, R. L. (2018). Writing for academic journals. Routledge.

Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2-17.

Lee, S., & Taylor, B. (2014). Factors affecting academic publishing: A literature review. Higher Education, 45(3), 12-25.

Lewison, G., & Hartley, J. (2005). What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63(2), 341-356.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Lipson, C. (2005). How to write a BA thesis: A practical guide from your first ideas to your finished paper. University of Chicago Press.

Lorenc, T., & Hicks, D. (2016). The importance of the abstract in original research papers. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 14(2), 1-2.

Macnamara, J. (2016). The work and ‘architecture of listening’: Addressing gaps in organization-public communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 133-148.

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Modern Language Association. (2021). MLA handbook (9th ed.). Modern Language Association.

Murray, R. (2013). Writing for academic journals. 3^rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.

Nicholas, D., & Watkinson, A. (2014). Digital access, use, and citation of scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 27(1), 21-32.

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01.

Özgenel, M., & Mert, P. (2019). The role of teacher performance in school effectiveness. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4(10), 417-434.

Özdemir, O., & Açık F. (2019). Development of written expression skills with flipped learning instruction: An embedded mixed method study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(4), 1075-1091

Özdemir, O. (2023). Using a genre-based writing method in the distance education classroom. Turkish Journal of Education, 12(2), 72-93.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Routledge.

Pham, B., & Hoffmann, T. (2015). How to write a systematic review. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 67.

Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis?links=falseWijaya

Ritzenberg, A., & Mendelsohn, S. (2021). How scholars write. Oxford University Press.

Rodrigues, R. J. (2013). Copyright and plagiarism. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 38(4), 787-790.

Rossig, W. E., & Prätsch, J. (2005). Academic research and writing: A concise introduction. Peter Lang.

Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121-132.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366.

Simmons, O. E., Huddleston-Casas, C., & Berry, A. A. (2018). The effective academic writing guide: An interactive tool for improving academic writing skills in higher education. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 52-65.

Smith, J. A. (2010). Evaluative criteria and critique of qualitative research articles. In M. A. Forrester (Ed.), Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 221-233). Sage.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26-28.

Sutherland, W. J., Fleishman, E., Mascia, M. B., Pretty, J., & Rudd, M. A. (2014). Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(10), 956-965.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1), 10-38.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.

Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167-190.

Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., ... & Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e21101.

The Chicago Manual of Style. (2017). The Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(8), 573-576.4x

Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,4, 307–323.

Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129.

Wager, E. (2011). Recognition, reward, and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas, 68(2), 109-112.

Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (No. 49). Sage.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.

Federation University Australia Study Skills (2023). Discussion Section’s Plan. Retrieved from  https://studyskills.federation.edu.au/orientation/study-support-services/postgraduate-resources/discussion-section/

Academic Skills Kit [Newcastle University] (2024). Main Sampling Methods Retrieved from https://www.ncl.ac.uk/webtemplate/ask-assets/external/maths-resources/statistics/sampling/types-of-sampling.html