EN | PT | TR | RO | BG | SR
;

Modul 11. SISTEMATSKI PREGLED LITERATURE


REZIME

Ovaj odeljak pruža objašnjenje procesa sistematskog pregleda literature, njegovog značaja u naučnom istraživanju i negove primene u različitim disciplinama.

Autori

Ece YAĞCI AKGÜZDÜZ

Dr. Mustafa ÖZGENEL


CILJEVI UČENJA
  1. Razumeti koncept i značaj sistematskog pregleda literature pri istraživanju.
  2. Naučiti ključne karakteristike koje definišu sistematski pregled.
  3. Razumeti razliku između sistematskih pregleda i tradicionalnih pregleda literature.
  4. Prepoznati faze koje obuhvata proces sistematskog pregleda literature.

SADRŽAJ JEDINICE




LITERATURA

Agbo, F., Sanusi, I., Oyelere, S., & Suhonen, J. (2021). Application of virtual reality in computer science education: a systemic review based on bibliometric and content analysis methods. Education Sciences, 11(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030142

Akin, M. (2021). Sağlık turizmi alanyazının bibliyometrik analizi (2015-2020) [Bibliometric analysis of health tourism literature (2015-2020)]. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(3), 2026-2036. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.882655

Asgari, Z., Naghavi, A., & Abedi, M. R. (2023). Grief interventions: A qualitative review of systematic reviews. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 28(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2022.2102304

Avila, C., Bacca-Acosta, J., Duarte, J., & Betancourt, J. (2021). x. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), s. 302 https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10865

Aydin, A. and Uysal, Ş. (2014). Türkiye ‘de eğitim yönetimi teftişi planlaması ve ekonomisi alanındaki doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi. [Examination of doctoral theses in the field of educational administration, inspection, planning and economics in Turkey].  Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2014.14.1-5000091508

Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2018). Eğitim yönetiminde sistematik derleme çalışmaları [Systematic review studies in educational administration]. In K. Beycioğlu, N. Özer & Y. Kondakçı (Eds.), Eğitim yönetiminde araştırma (pp. 507-573).

Bitzenbauer, P. (2021). Quantum physics education research over the last two decades: a bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 11(11), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110699

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009

Clarke, J. (2011). What is a systematic review? Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.1136/EBN.2011.0049

Cook, D., Mulrow, C., & Haynes, R. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006

Cumpston, M., Flemyng, E., Thomas, J., Higgins, JPT., Deeks, JJ., & Clarke, MJ. (2023). Chapter I: Introduction. In Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, & Welch VA (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of ınterventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane.

Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2012). x (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Gough, D., & Richardson, M. (2018). Systematic reviews. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 63–75). Routledge.

Granholm, A., Anthon, C., Perner, A., Laake, J., & Møller, M. (2019). Transparent and systematic reporting of meta-epidemiological studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112, 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.014

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.

Hallinger, P. and Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380

Hannigan, B., Edwards, D., & Burnard, P. (2004). Stress and stress management in clinical psychology: Findings from a systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 13(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230410001700871

Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of ınterventions. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org

Kushairi, N., & Ahmi, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: a Bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4401–4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10457-8/TABLES/16

Li, K. and Wong, B. (2021). Research landscape of smart education: a bibliometric analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-05-2021-0083

Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J., … & Moher, D. (2009). The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Loke, Y., Price, D., & Herxheimer, A. (2007). Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 32–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-32.

MacMillan, F., McBride, K. A., George, E. S., & Steiner, G. Z. (2019). Conducting a systematic review: A practical guide. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 805–826). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_113

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS, and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. In BMC Health Services Research (Vol. 14, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Estarli, M., Barrera, E. S. A., Martínez-Rodríguez, R., Baladia, E., Agüero, S. D., Camacho, S., Buhring, K., Herrero-López, A., Gil-González, D. M., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., … Whitlock, E. (2016). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, 20(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1/TABLES/4

Murphy, G. (2019). A systematic review and thematic synthesis of research on school leadership in the Republic of Ireland: 2008–2018. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(6), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2018-0211/FULL/HTML

Özdemir, N., Gümüş, S., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2022). A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221118662

Özkaya, M., & Şahin, S. (2022). Özel gereksinimli bireylerin eğitiminde hareket tabanlı teknolojilerin kullanımı: sistematik alanyazın taraması ve bibliyometrik analiz. [The use of movement-based technologies in the education of individuals with special needs: systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis] Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.62.9

Özyurt, Ö. (2022). Empirical research of emerging trends and patterns across the flipped classroom studies using topic modeling. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4335–4362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11396-8

Page, M., Shamseer, L., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Sampson, M., Tricco, A., … & Moher, D. (2016). Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study. Plos Medicine, 13(5), e1002028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001

Polanin, J. R., Pigott, T. D., Espelage, D. L., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 330-342.

Randles, R., & Finnegan, A. (2023). Guidelines for writing a systematic review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105803

Reeves, S., Koppel, I., Barr, H., Freeth, D., & Hammick, M. (2002). Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic review. Medical Teacher, 24(4), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220145707

Sharma, A. and Bhattarai, P. (2022). Mixed methods research in employability discourse: a systematic literature review using prisma. Education Research International, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4848220

Tam, W., Lo, K., & Khalechelvam, P. (2017). Endorsement of prisma statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 7(2), e013905. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905

Taubner, H., Tideman, M., & Staland Nyman, C. (2022). Employment sustainability for people with ıntellectual disability: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10926-021-10020-9/TABLES/4

Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step-by-step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41182-019-0165-6

Tetik, H. (2022). An overview of the use of humor in the organization: bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 223-244. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1097314

Ünal, O. (2022). Türkiye’de eğitim fakültesi dergilerinde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi6(2), 256-281.

HSL [Healty Sciences Library, University of North Caroline] (2024). What are the different types of reviews? - Ask HSL. (2024). https://asklib.hsl.unc.edu/faq/366908

What are the Steps of a Systematic Review? - Systematic Reviews - LibGuides at Ohio State University-Health Sciences Library. (n.d.). Retrieved January 27, 2024, from https://hslguides.osu.edu/systematic_reviews/steps