EN | PT | TR | RO | BG | SR
;

Modül 8: META ANALİZ


ÖZET

Bu modül, birden fazla çalışmada araştırma sonuçlarını sentezlemek için güçlü bir istatistiksel araç olan meta-analizi yürütmek ve yorumlamak için gereken temel beceri ve bilgilerle sizi donatmak üzere tasarlanmıştır.

Modül boyunca tıp, psikoloji, eğitim ve sosyal bilimler de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli alanlarda uygulanabilecek temel kavramlar ve metodolojiler hakkında bilgi edineceksiniz.

Bu kursun sonunda, meta-analitik literatürü eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirebilecek, kendi meta-analizlerinizi gerçekleştirebilecek ve araştırmanın titizliğini ve güvenilirliğini artırmak için bu teknikleri uygulayabileceksiniz.

İster acemi ister deneyimli bir araştırmacı olun, bu eğitim size meta-analiz anlayışınızı ve uygulamanızı geliştirecek bilgi ve araçlar sağlayacaktır.

Yazar:

José Manuel Carvalho Vieira, PhD

Maia Üniversitesi (Portekiz)

 

Çeviri:

Mustafa Özgenel


ÖĞRENME HEDEFLERİ

Bu Modüle katılanlar şunları yapabilmelidir:

1. Sistematik İnceleme ve Meta-Analiz arasındaki farkı ayırt edebilmelidir;

2. Karmaşık metodolojiyi, bileşenlerini ve ölçütlerini anlamak ve uygulamak;

3. Kalitesini, faktörlerini ve potansiyel önyargılarını değerlendirme;

4. Meta-Analiz Projelerinizi gerçekleştirin.


ÜNİTE İÇERİĞİ





REFERANSLAR

AJE Team. (2023). Assessing and Avoiding Publication Bias in Meta-analyses | AJE. Springer Nature. https://www.aje.com/arc/assessing-and-avoiding-publication-bias-in-meta-analyses/

Blackhall, K., & Ker, K. (2007). Finding studies for inclusion in systematic reviews of interventions for injury prevention – the importance of grey and unpublished literature. Injury Prevention, 13(5), 359. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.017020

Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). Meta-Analysis: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Wiley.

Cheung, M. W.-L., & Vijayakumar, R. (2016). A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 26(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-016-9319-z

Côté, I. M., & Jennions, M. D. (2013). 2. The Procedure of Meta-analysis in a Nutshell. In Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (pp. 14–24). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400846184-004

Davis, D. W., Carrier, B., Barrios, B., Cruz, K., & Navalta, J. W. (2021). A protocol and novel tool for systematically reviewing the effects of mindful walking on mental and cardiovascular health. PLOS ONE, 16(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258424

Deeks, J., Higgins, J., & Altman, D. (2023). Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current

DerSimonian, R., & Kacker, R. (2007). Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004

Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta‐analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733

Freelon, D. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 20–33.

Freelon, D. (2013). ReCal OIR: Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Intercoder Reliability as a Web Service. Int. J. Internet Sci., 8, 10–16.

Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003

Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., & Stewart, G. (2018). Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature, 555(7695), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25753

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Hansen, C., Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2022). How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: A practical guide. Management Review Quarterly, 72(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4

Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2021). Pooling Effect Sizes | Doing Meta-Analysis in R. In Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide (1st ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/pooling-es.html

Havranek, T., & Irsova, Z. (2016). Do Borders Really Slash Trade? A Meta-Analysis. IMF Economic Review, 65(2), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-016-0001-5

Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Cumpston, C., & Welch, V. (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current

Ioannidis, J. (2017). Next-generation systematic reviews: Prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(20), 1456–1458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097621

Irsova, Z., Doucouliagos, H., Havranek, T., & Stanley, T. D. (2023). Meta-analysis of social science research: A practitioner’s guide. Journal of Economic Surveys, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12595

Jak, S. (2015). Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27174-3

Kaufmann, E., & Reips, U.-D. (2024). Meta-analysis in a digitalized world: A step-by-step primer. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02374-8

Kepes, S., Wang, W., & Cortina, J. M. (2023). Heterogeneity in Meta-Analytic Effect Sizes: An Assessment of the Current State of the Literature. Organizational Research Methods, 10944281231169942. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231169942

Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J., & Mengersen, K. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press.

Mathur, M. B. (2024). Sensitivity analysis for the interactive effects of internal bias and publication bias in meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1667

O’Rourke, K. (2007). An historical perspective on meta-analysis: Dealing quantitatively with varying study results. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(12), 579–582. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2121629/

Page, M. J., Sterne, J. A. C., Higgins, J. P. T., & Egger, M. (2021). Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(2), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1468

Papakostidis, C., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2023). Meta-analysis. What have we learned? Injury, 54(3), S30–S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.012

Schmid, C. H., Stijnen, T., & White, I. R. (2020). Handbook of Meta-Analysis (C. H. Schmid, T. Stijnen, & I. White, Eds.; 1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119403

Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Ghersi, D., Berlin, J. A., & Askie, L. (2019). A guide to prospective meta-analysis. BMJ, l5342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5342

Sen, S., & Yildirim, I. (2022). A Tutorial on How to Conduct Meta-Analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. Psych, 4(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4040049

Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., Emberson, J. R., Hernán, M. A., Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D. R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, J. J., Lasserson, T., Li, T., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6

Wallace, B. C., Dahabreh, I. J., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2013). Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: Tools and methods. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.13.17

Yusuff, H. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Medicine, 3(S1), e133. https://doi.org/10.51496/jogm.v3.S1.133

Zigraiova, D., Havranek, T., & Novak, J. (2020). How puzzling is the forward premium puzzle? A meta-analysis (46; Working Paper Series). European Stability Mechanism. https://www.esm.europa.eu/system/files/document/wp46.pdf


Ekler